Digital Actors
Monday, May 30, 2011 @ 11:46 AM
Definitely both. However, I believe that this is more acting than animation. Avatar was an exceptional film; the animation was incredible but it relied on the actor's performance to make a realistic approach to the audience. The animators have made it so their character's are able to display precise human-like movement and that is only because the actor's were there.
2. Do you think that animated character should be eligible for acting awards?
I don't think that the animated characters should be nominated for acting awards but I do believe they deserve some sort of special recognition. Reason being is that the animated characters are animated and altered versions of them. Avatar is not the actor-type of film. The actors are not able to display their acting skills properly because in the end, it is altered by some sort of program.
3. Do you think that human actors will ever become obsolete? Why or why not?
Human actors will not ever become obsolete because they are able to show feelings, passion and creativity in their acting ability that animated characters are not capable of expressing. Human actors are essential when discussing films. Their voices and their stage presence is what makes the film. Animated actors and human actors are incomparable because the animated characters are incapable of telling the audience that they've made so much effort into their acting. It's only by the works of a human that a performance can truly be exceptional.
0 comments: leave a comment
